6JSC/BL/17
5 June 2014
Changes to Appendix D.0 and D.1.3.1
British Library (BL)
———————–
6JSC/BL/17/ALA response Changes to Appendix D.0 and D.1.3.1 (September 10, 2014)
-
Recent posts
- RSC/Operations/6 — Policy and procedures for RSC Meetings
- RSC/Operations/3 — General Terms of Reference for RSC Working Groups
- RSC/Operations/1 — Policy and Procedures for RSC Operations
- RSC/Operations/2 — RSC Position Responsibilities
- RSC/Operations/5 — Guidelines for Proposals, Discussion Papers, and Responses to Them
Recent comments
- Kathy Glennan on Expanding RDA 6.29.1.3, Laws Governing More Than One Jurisdiction
- Amanda Ros on Adding Controlled Vocabulary to RDA 3.19.6, Regional Encoding, and to the Glossary
- Amanda Ros on Adding Controlled Vocabulary to RDA 3.19.6, Regional Encoding, and to the Glossary
- Amanda Ros on Adding Controlled Vocabulary to RDA 3.19.6, Regional Encoding, and to the Glossary
- Amanda Ros on Adding Controlled Vocabulary to RDA 3.19.6, Regional Encoding, and to the Glossary
Archives
Comment policy
Only current CC:DA members and liaisons are authorized to comment on posts. Others who wish to contribute to CC:DA's discussions are invited to provide input by contacting the Chair, a member of the Committee, or their appropriate liaison.
New CC:DA members and liaisons will be assigned an account for the CC:DA Blog during the month of their initial appointment. For assistance with an account contact the CC:DA Webmaster.
All first-time comments on this site are moderated. We ask that all comments be relevant to the post to which they are directed and maintain professional courtesy.
All categories
Tag cloud
agenda ALA2012 ALA2013 ALA2014 ALA2015 ALA2016 ALA proposal Annual 2012 Annual 2013 Annual 2014 Annual 2015 Behrens Bourassa British Library Canadian Committee on Cataloguing Chair's report corporate bodies Dunsire Glennan Iseminger JSC JSC rep Lapka Leonard Library of Congress McGrath Midwinter 2012 Midwinter 2013 Midwinter 2014 Midwinter 2016 minutes music Music Working Group (JSC) Myers NARDAC OLAC PCC Rendall Reser response Robare Rolla RSC Shrader SnyderLinks
Although the proposal lacks sufficient RDA text for adequate context (and lacks justification altogether for the change to D.1.3.1), comparison of the current RDA text and the proposed change confirms these are reasonable simplifications.
The references to the JSC minutes provide the context John asks about above. For CC:DA’s convenience, I have included them here:
452.3 During the harmonization discussions between the Review Group and the JSC during the 2011 JSC meeting in Glasgow, the Review Group agreed to review RDA D.1. The Review Group noted in its response that the scope as described in RDA D.0 (mapping of RDA to ISBD) does not match what is in D.1 (mapping of ISBD to RDA). Alan Danskin volunteered to revise the text of D.0. ACTION=BL rep
452.8 The JSC reviewed the comments about appendix D.1 in the Review Group response.
#1: They noted that the current structure of D.1 from ISBD to RDA was intended as a bridge for those people who know ISBD.
#2: They supported continued collaboration.
#3: They agreed that the goal is to point to a single document.
#4: They agreed to remove the content in D.1.3 and instead give a reference to Appendix A in the consolidated edition.
#5: They supported the future location of the D.1 information on the Tools tab of RDA Toolkit so it would be available without a subscription to the Toolkit.
I support this proposal as written.
I also support this proposal. The change suggested in D.0 makes it clear that D.2 includes a link to the mapping and not the mapping itself.
I support this proposal as well.