6JSC/BL/17
5 June 2014
Changes to Appendix D.0 and D.1.3.1
British Library (BL)
———————–
6JSC/BL/17/ALA response Changes to Appendix D.0 and D.1.3.1 (September 10, 2014)
Search
-
Recent posts
- Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- RDA Vocabulary Encoding Scheme for Manifestation: Type of Binding
- Timespan and Units of Time
- Internationalization of RDA Toolkit During the 3R Project
- Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access Chair’s Report on CC:DA Motions and Other Actions, January—June, 2020
- Library of Congress Report, 2020 Virtual Event
- Report of the MAC Liaison
- CC:DA 2020 Summer Virtual Meeting
- Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
Recent comments
- Ryan Tamares on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Keith Knop on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Dominique Bourassa on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Thomas Dousa on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Thomas Dousa on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Kathryn Lybarger on RSC Paper on RDA Conformance
- Kathryn Lybarger on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Amanda Ros on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Kathryn Lybarger on Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
- Keith Knop on RSC Paper on RDA Conformance
- Keith Knop on Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
- Keith Knop on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Thomas Dousa on RSC Paper on RDA Conformance
- Thomas Dousa on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Thomas Dousa on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Ryan Tamares on Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
- Ryan Tamares on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Ryan Tamares on DRAFT: Report: CCDA Task Force to review the Proposal on Changing Procedural Guidelines for Proposed New or Revised Romanization Tables
- Kathryn Lybarger on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Keith Knop on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Keith Knop on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Ryan Tamares on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Ryan Tamares on Appendices for Representative expressions of aggregating works
- Ryan Tamares on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Ryan Tamares on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Robert L. Maxwell on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Robert L. Maxwell on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Robert L. Maxwell on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- kelleym on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Karen Stafford on Expression Excerpts
- Kathryn Lybarger on Expression Excerpts
- Ryan Tamares on Expression Excerpts
- Ryan Tamares on RDA Content Elements
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Expression Excerpts
- Karen Stafford on RDA Content Elements
- Kathryn Lybarger on RDA Content Elements
- Mary Huismann on Expression Excerpts
- Mary Huismann on RDA Content Elements
Archives
Comment policy
Only current CC:DA members and liaisons are authorized to comment on posts. Others who wish to contribute to CC:DA's discussions are invited to provide input by contacting the Chair, a member of the Committee, or their appropriate liaison.
New CC:DA members and liaisons will be assigned an account for the CC:DA Blog during the month of their initial appointment. For assistance with an account contact the CC:DA Webmaster.
All first-time comments on this site are moderated. We ask that all comments be relevant to the post to which they are directed and maintain professional courtesy.
All categories
Tag cloud
agenda ALA2012 ALA2013 ALA2014 ALA2015 ALA2016 ALA proposal Annual 2012 Annual 2013 Annual 2014 Annual 2015 Behrens Bourassa British Library Canadian Committee on Cataloguing Chair's report corporate bodies Dunsire Glennan Iseminger JSC JSC rep Lapka Library of Congress McGrath Midwinter 2012 Midwinter 2013 Midwinter 2014 Midwinter 2016 minutes music Music Working Group (JSC) Myers NARDAC OLAC PCC RDA Rendall Reser response Robare Rolla RSC Shrader SnyderLinks
Although the proposal lacks sufficient RDA text for adequate context (and lacks justification altogether for the change to D.1.3.1), comparison of the current RDA text and the proposed change confirms these are reasonable simplifications.
The references to the JSC minutes provide the context John asks about above. For CC:DA’s convenience, I have included them here:
452.3 During the harmonization discussions between the Review Group and the JSC during the 2011 JSC meeting in Glasgow, the Review Group agreed to review RDA D.1. The Review Group noted in its response that the scope as described in RDA D.0 (mapping of RDA to ISBD) does not match what is in D.1 (mapping of ISBD to RDA). Alan Danskin volunteered to revise the text of D.0. ACTION=BL rep
452.8 The JSC reviewed the comments about appendix D.1 in the Review Group response.
#1: They noted that the current structure of D.1 from ISBD to RDA was intended as a bridge for those people who know ISBD.
#2: They supported continued collaboration.
#3: They agreed that the goal is to point to a single document.
#4: They agreed to remove the content in D.1.3 and instead give a reference to Appendix A in the consolidated edition.
#5: They supported the future location of the D.1 information on the Tools tab of RDA Toolkit so it would be available without a subscription to the Toolkit.
I support this proposal as written.
I also support this proposal. The change suggested in D.0 makes it clear that D.2 includes a link to the mapping and not the mapping itself.
I support this proposal as well.