CC:DA/JSC Rep/KPG/2014/6
Proposal: Creating instructions for using nominative case for titles (RDA 6.2) and names (RDA 8.5)
Search
-
Recent posts
- Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- RDA Vocabulary Encoding Scheme for Manifestation: Type of Binding
- Timespan and Units of Time
- Internationalization of RDA Toolkit During the 3R Project
- Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access Chair’s Report on CC:DA Motions and Other Actions, January—June, 2020
- Library of Congress Report, 2020 Virtual Event
- Report of the MAC Liaison
- CC:DA 2020 Summer Virtual Meeting
- Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
Recent comments
- Ryan Tamares on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Keith Knop on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Dominique Bourassa on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Thomas Dousa on Proposal to add the elements “curator agent of work” and “curator agent of work of” to RDA
- Thomas Dousa on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Kathryn Lybarger on RSC Paper on RDA Conformance
- Kathryn Lybarger on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Amanda Ros on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Kathryn Lybarger on Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
- Keith Knop on RSC Paper on RDA Conformance
- Keith Knop on Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
- Keith Knop on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Thomas Dousa on RSC Paper on RDA Conformance
- Thomas Dousa on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Thomas Dousa on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Ryan Tamares on Revision of the Beta Toolkit Menu Tab for Resources
- Ryan Tamares on RDA Entity Boundaries
- Ryan Tamares on DRAFT: Report: CCDA Task Force to review the Proposal on Changing Procedural Guidelines for Proposed New or Revised Romanization Tables
- Kathryn Lybarger on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Keith Knop on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Keith Knop on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Ryan Tamares on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Ryan Tamares on Appendices for Representative expressions of aggregating works
- Ryan Tamares on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Ryan Tamares on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Robert L. Maxwell on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Robert L. Maxwell on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Robert L. Maxwell on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on Progress report on the use of RDA unconstrained element set for display labels
- Nancy Mitchell Poehlmann on Community vocabularies in RDA Toolkit
- kelleym on Representative expressions of an aggregating work
- Karen Stafford on Expression Excerpts
- Kathryn Lybarger on Expression Excerpts
- Ryan Tamares on Expression Excerpts
- Ryan Tamares on RDA Content Elements
- Timothy Ryan Mendenhall on Expression Excerpts
- Karen Stafford on RDA Content Elements
- Kathryn Lybarger on RDA Content Elements
- Mary Huismann on Expression Excerpts
- Mary Huismann on RDA Content Elements
Archives
Comment policy
Only current CC:DA members and liaisons are authorized to comment on posts. Others who wish to contribute to CC:DA's discussions are invited to provide input by contacting the Chair, a member of the Committee, or their appropriate liaison.
New CC:DA members and liaisons will be assigned an account for the CC:DA Blog during the month of their initial appointment. For assistance with an account contact the CC:DA Webmaster.
All first-time comments on this site are moderated. We ask that all comments be relevant to the post to which they are directed and maintain professional courtesy.
All categories
Tag cloud
agenda ALA2012 ALA2013 ALA2014 ALA2015 ALA2016 ALA proposal Annual 2012 Annual 2013 Annual 2014 Annual 2015 Behrens Bourassa British Library Canadian Committee on Cataloguing Chair's report corporate bodies Dunsire Glennan Iseminger JSC JSC rep Lapka Library of Congress McGrath Midwinter 2012 Midwinter 2013 Midwinter 2014 Midwinter 2016 minutes music Music Working Group (JSC) Myers NARDAC OLAC PCC RDA Rendall Reser response Robare Rolla RSC Shrader SnyderLinks
Regarding the paper CC:DA will be discussing about the use of nominative case: I think it needs clarification regarding those languages where inflection changes when the case marker is not carried by all the words in a phrase. For example, in the German title “Der blaue Reiter”, all three words in the phrase are in the nominative, but the marker for the nominative case is carried only by the article and the noun, not by the adjective. Alternatively, the title could be given without an article as “Blauer Reiter.” Both expressions are correct, and in both “blue” is in the nominative case. The sticky issue is not about case–it’s about whether a transcription which chooses to omit initial articles should be true to its source–“Blaue Reiter”–or corrected to represent a different grammatical construction, one without the article–“Blauer Reiter.”
Ideally an article could be included as a non-sorting term in such titles. If it were, the transcription would be “[Der] blaue Reiter”, which would index under “blaue”, which argues for preferring accurate transcription over adding a “corrected” case ending.
For a name example, Konrad Adenauer was known as “Der Alte” (implying “Der alte Mann”). If this were to be used as a name access point omitting the initial article, should it be “Alte” following usage, or “Alter” adding the nominative inflection explicitly, but departing from the common usage? Both are nominative case.
I’d argue that RDA should prescribe a sequence of operations: first, determine that a name or title expression is in the nominative; then, remove (or screen from indexing) any initial article. Removing the article first and then trying to impose a “correct” case ending is the wrong approach.– Stephen Hearn via email (posted by Rolla)
I have another comment to make, this on CC:DA/JSC Rep/KPG/2014/6 (“Creating instructions for using nominative case for titles (RDA 6.2) and names (RDA
8.5)”) and CC:DA/JSC Rep/KPG/2014/4 (“Using the mark of omission in preferred titles (RDA 6.2)”). The paragraph under RDA 6.2.1.3 is repeated several times in Chapter 6, with slight variations: 6.14.1.3; 6.19.1.3; 6.23.1.3; and 6.26.1.3. I didn’t see these instructions mentioned in the proposals’ text, but any revision to 6.2.1.3 may need to be mirrored in these other locations too. — Mark Ehlert via email (posted by Rolla)
The issues related the consequences of omitting an initial article raised by Stephen Hearn in the comment above (posted by Peter) are different from the one addressed by this proposal on grammatical case. Maybe our current practices related to names and titles like Der Blaue Reiter and Der Alte should be better explained, or changed, but the way to do that would involve changes to 6.2.1.7, 11.2.2.8, and elsewhere. I think that could be discussed separately from this proposal, which simply adds language telling us to convert a non-nominative form to a nominative one and then proceed as usual.
It’s also important to remember that the U.S. practice to drop the initial article is now an *Alternative* in RDA 6.2.1.7 (recording titles of works), in RDA 11.2.2.8 (recording names of corporate bodies), and in RDA 16.2.2.4 (recording the name of places). Over time, the JSC expects that the examples throughout RDA will change to illustrate the main instruction to record the initial article, rather than showing the alternative. Some examples have already been modified.
We should let the Germans weigh in on this, who are obviously the experts on how their own language behaves. The basic point is, however, in languages that have case nominative forms are chosen for access points. Perhaps a tweak is needed for languages such as German where the nominative form is different depending on whether the noun is accompanied by an article or not. Though I would think, since RDA has the option of either keeping or dropping the article, in either case the base rule (principle?) would be the same—record the nominative case. If your agency is recording names/titles with the article, then the nominative form with the article is the form that should be recorded; if your agency is following the option to drop the article from names/titles, then the nominative form without the article would be recorded.