January 28, 2014
American Library Association, 2014 Midwinter Meeting. Submitted by David Reser, LC Liaison
January 28, 2014
American Library Association, 2014 Midwinter Meeting. Submitted by David Reser, LC Liaison
CC:DA/A/69
Note: Links are provided to the documents listed on the agenda. These are working documents and are to be used as part of the rule revision process. They are not to be copied or distributed without permission from the Chair of CC:DA.
For easy printability, see Agenda for Midwinter Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, PA [Word]
CC:DA/Chair/2013-2014/2
January 13, 2014
Chair’s Report on CC:DA Motions and Other Actions July-December 2013
CC:DA/JSC Rep/KPG/2013/5
December 13, 2013
Discussion paper:
Date of Production and Date of Manufacture elements: should a priority order be provided to prefer data in the resource itself first?
Kathy Glennan, ALA Representative to the Joint Steering Committee
CC:DA/JSC Rep/KPG/2013/4
Discussion paper
Core elements in Distribution and Manufacture Statements: what constitutes “applicable and readily ascertainable”?
CC:DA/JSC Rep/KPG/2013/2
Discussion for Proposal
June 29, 2013
American Library Association, 2013 Annual Conference, Chicago, IL. Submitted by David Reser, LC Liaison
CC:DA/A/68
June 29 & July 1, 2013
Note: Links are provided to the documents listed on the agenda. These are working documents and are to be used as part of the rule revision process. They are not to be copied or distributed without permission from the Chair of CC:DA.
For easy printability, see Agenda for Annual 2013, Chicago, IL[Word].
CC:DA needs to examine and approve these Romanization tables in response to this announcement by PSD. Please take a moment to examine them in order to approve them after the constituency review, which ends in July. See the announcement below from PSD.
The Policy and Standards Division of the Library of Congress has received revision proposals for the Bulgarian and the Serbian and Macedonian ALA-LC romanization tables from Dr. Nikolay Valkov of Harvard University. The Bulgarian proposal corrects several minor typographical errors and adds language that clarifies the romanization of the Bulgarian letter Ъ. The Serbian and Macedonian table has historically combined romanization for these two languages. Serbian and Macedonian are two separate languages that use similar alphabets. It is proposed that each have a separate ALA-LC romanization table.
The revision proposals are available for downloading; Bulgarian [PDF, 99 KB], Macedonian [PDF, 88 KB], and Serbian [PDF, 85 KB].
Comments on these proposals may be sent to Bruce Johnson, Policy and Standards Division (bjoh@loc.gov) by July 11, 2013.
CC:DA/TF/ Investigate Changes Affecting RDA in the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition/4/Rev
November 16, 2012; rev. February 26, 2013
Final Report from the Task Force on the Chicago Manual of Style
The Task Force to Investigate Changes Affecting RDA in the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition, has submitted its final report. Most of the recommendations involve minor editorial changes to RDA and related documentation. One of the recommendations, however, involves a substantive change to RDA which would have a major impact on authorized access points. I would like to suggest that CC:DA discuss and vote on this recommendation; the rest can be handled as Fast Track proposals.
The recommendation in question relates to CMOS 8.159, which deals with capitalization of hyphenated compounds. In the 16th edition, this provision reads:
The following rules apply to hyphenated terms appearing in a title capitalized in headline style. For reasons of consistency and editorial efficiency, Chicago no longer advises making exceptions to these rules for the rare awkward-looking result (though such niceties may occasionally be observed in display settings, as on the cover of a book). For rules of hyphenation, see 7.77–85.
1. Always capitalize the first element.
2. Capitalize any subsequent elements unless they are articles, prepositions, coordinating conjunctions (and, but, for, or, nor), or such modifiers as flat or sharp following musical key symbols.
3. If the first element is merely a prefix or combining form that could not stand by itself as a word (anti, pre, etc.), do not capitalize the second element unless it is a proper noun or proper adjective.
4. Capitalize the second element in a hyphenated spelled-out number (twenty-one or twenty-first, etc.) or hyphenated simple fraction (two-thirds in two-thirds majority). This departure from previous Chicago recommendations recognizes the functional equality of the numbers before and after the hyphen.
The Task Force proposes to revise RDA A.29 to conform to this provision (see p. 9 of the TF report); formerly in RDA, only the first word in such a compound was capitalized.
In addition to RDA A.29, this issue is also the basis for the following TF recommendations:
RDA 9.2.2.25
RDA 11.2.2.11
RDA 11.2.2.24.2
RDA 11.2.3.6
RDA 11.2.3.7 [two instances]
RDA 19.2.1.3 [2nd instance]
RDA A.11.4
RDA A.14 [2nd instance]
RDA A.16.2 [two instances]
RDA A.16.5
RDA A.17.6
RDA Glossary, Tonic Sol-fa
As Kathy Glennan reported at Midwinter, she asked Gary Strawn to look at the impact of this change on the NACO authority file. He provided some statistics, but the bottom line was that instances needing to be changed would be difficult to identify by program and even more difficult to correct safely.
Given the impact of this recommendation and given that differences in capitalization are not taken into account by the NACO normalization rules, it seems questionable that this is a revision that CC:DA would wish to propose. My understanding is that CMOS governs the text of RDA itself, but governs the results of applying RDA instructions only when there is no applicable RDA instruction. In this case, the text of RDA A.29 applies, and need not conform to the provisions of CMOS.
Beyond this single issue, I propose (a) to communicate to the JSC Secretary the recommended revisions to the RDA Editor’s Guide; and (b) to make Fast Track proposals for the following TF recommendations:
RDA 1.1.2
RDA 1.1.3
RDA 2.20.10.3
RDA 6.2.2.4
RDA 6.30.2.2
RDA 8.12.1.3
RDA 19.2.1.3 [1st instance]
RDA A.10 [three instances]
RDA A.14 [1st instance]
For the sake of completeness, the TF recommended that no change be made in the following instructions:
RDA 7.17.3.3
RDA B.11
RDA H.1
Again, I suggest that CC:DA discuss and vote on the recommendation for RDA A.29 (and related instructions); if there is any disagreement with any of the other recommendations, these should be raised during the discussion.
John